Development of environmental rights in China: substantive environmental rights or procedural environmental rights
| Author | ZHU Xiao, WANG Shenghang, Eva-Maria Ehemann |
| Pages | 24-56 |
FRONTIERS OF LAW IN CHINA
VOL. 12 MARCH 2017 NO. 1
DOI 10.3868/s050-006-017-0003-6
FOCUS
PUBLIC PARTICIPATION IN ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
DEVELOPMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL RIGHTS IN CHINA: SUBSTANTIVE
ENVIRONMENTAL RIGHTS OR PROCEDURAL ENVIRONMENTAL RIGHTS
ZHU Xiao*, WANG Shenghang**, Eva-Maria Ehemann***
Abstract The relationship between environmental and human rights is very significant.
On this basis, humans shall have the right to claim to live in a healthy environment. In
China, the study of environmental rights began in the 1980’s. After more than thirty
years of discussions on environmental rights, there are a series of environmental rights
theories in China. However, scholars have not formed a consensus on some fundamental
theories of environmental rights. Moreover, some experts consider that environmental
rights include substantive environmental rights and procedural environmental rights,
whereas others argue that environmental rights only include substantive environmental
rights. Furthermore, the nexus and difference between the right to environment and
environmental rights are not clear. “Environmental rights” are treated as a broad concept,
its scope includes all rights which are related to the environment. They certainly do not
only include substantive, but also procedural environmental rights. Even though the
introduction of substantive environmental rights has faced both legislative and practical
difficulties, the topic has become a central issue in Chinese academic research.
Keywords environmental right, substantive right, procedural right
INTRODUCTION ...................................................................................................................... 26
I. OVERVIEW OF ENVIRONMENTAL RIGHTS THEORY .................................................... 26
A. Statistics of Research of Environmental Rights in China ..................................... 27
B. The Main Theories of Environmental Rights in China......................................... 28
1. Narrow Environmental Rights Theory.............................................................. 28
* (竺效) Ph.D. in Environmental Law, School of Law, Renmin University of China, Beijing,
China; Professor in Environmental Law, School of Law, Renmin University of China, Beijing 100872, China.
Contact: x.zhu@ruc.edu.cn
** (王盛航) Ph.D. Candidate, School of Law, Renmin University of China, Beijing 100872, China. Contact:
sh.wang@ ruc.edu.cn
*** Eva-Maria Ehemann, Ph.D. Candidate, Faculty of Law, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany. Contact:
eva.ehemann@jura.uni-muenchen.de
2017] DEVELOPMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL RIGHTS IN CHINA 25
2. General Environment Rights Theory................................................................ 29
3. Negative Environmental Rights Theory........................................................... 29
C. Understanding of Environmental Rights .............................................................. 29
1. The Definition of the Right to Environment..................................................... 29
2. The Definition of Environmental Rights.......................................................... 30
3. Discrimination of Substantive Environmental Rights and Procedural
Environment Rights.......................................................................................... 30
II. PARADIGM SHIFTS WITHIN HUMAN AND ENVIRONMENTAL RIGHTS IN WESTERN
DEVELOPED COUNTRIES........................................................................................... 31
A. The Development of the Nexus between Ecological and Human Rights on the
Level of the United Nations ................................................................................ 31
B. Environmental Rights Legislation in the United States ....................................... 34
C. The Dilemma of Substantive Environmental Rights Legislation in Japan........... 37
D. Environmental Rights in the European Union and European Countries ............ 38
1. Environmental Implications within the European Charta of Human Rights and
the European Charter of Fundamental Rights................................................. 39
2. Procedural Rights in Environmental Matters in Europe: The Aarhus
Convention...................................................................................................... 40
3. Substantive Environmental Rights Guaranteed in European Nation
States............................................................................................................... 41
III. TRANSFORMATION OF DISCUSSION ON SUBSTANTIVE AND PROCEDURAL
ENVIRONMENTAL RIGHTS IN CHINA ....................................................................... 43
A. The Dilemma of Substantive Environmental Rights in China ............................43
1. The Dilemma of Substantive Environmental Rights Legislation.................. 43
2. The Dilemma of Execution of Substantive Environmental Rights................ 43
3. The Dilemma of Research of Substantive Environmental Rights................. 44
B. The Development of Procedural Environmental Rights in China...................... 45
1. Improvement of Procedural Environmental Rights Legislation.................... 45
2. Theoretical Study of Procedural Environmental Rights Increased................ 45
IV. PRACTICE OF PROCEDURAL ENVIRONMENTAL RIGHTS IN CHINA ........................... 46
A. Emergence and Content of Procedural Environmental Rights in China ........... 46
1. Emergence of Procedural Environmental Rights in China............................ 46
2. Content of Procedural Environmental Rights in China................................. 47
B. Practice of Disclosure of Environmental Information in China ........................ 48
1. Development of Legislation on Disclosure of Environmental Information in
China ............................................................................................................. 48
2. Disclosure of Governmental Environmental Information............................. 49
3. Disclosure of Enterprise Environmental Information.................................... 50
C. Practice of Public Participation in Environmental Protection in China........... 51
1. Development of Public Participation in Legislation in Environmental
Protection....................................................................................................... 51
26 FRONTIERS OF LAW IN CHINA [Vol. 12: 24
2. Public Participation Approaches in Environmental Protection...................... 52
D. Practice of the Right of Access to Justice in China........................................... 54
1. Litigation with Respect to Compensation for Environmental Pollution
Damage.......................................................................................................... 54
2. Environmental Public Interest Litigation ...................................................... 55
CONCLUSION.......................................................................................................................... 56
INTRODUCTION
Since the 1970’s there has been a profound discussion on whether substantive
environmental rights should be incorporated in international human rights treaties,
nevertheless an explicit recognition has not taken place. On the domestic legislative level,
many countries and regions have established environmental rights within their
Constitutions. Since the 1990’s, many scholars have changed the research mentality,
focusing on the study of procedural environmental rights from substantive environmental
rights. After critical discussion on the principal theories of environmental rights in China,
it can be summarized that environmental rights include both substantive and procedural
environmental rights. Furthermore, there is a certain dilemma of the study of
environmental rights in China, because the Chinese Constitution does not clearly define
the right to environment. While research and legislation of substantive environmental
rights show a slow progress, procedural environmental rights legislation has made some
achievements.
First, the article analyzes the main theories of environmental rights in China. In this
part, the definition of environmental rights and the right to environment, and
discrimination of substantive and procedural environment rights are mainly discussed. In
the second part, this article analyzes the situation of the US, Japan and the European
Union, to find the reasons for the shift in legislation from substantive to procedural
environmental rights in developed countries. Part three discusses the dilemma of
substantive environmental rights in China and the development of procedural
environmental rights in China. The final part provides an introduction of the practice of
procedural environmental rights in China, including the system of environmental public
participation and environmental information disclosure as well as environmental public
interest litigation.
I. OVERVIEW OF ENVIRONMENTAL RIGHTS THEORY
In China, the study of environmental rights began in the 1980’s. “Citizens Should
Have Environmental Rights — Discussion on the Environment, Law, and Citizenship
Issues,” the first article on environmental rights, was published by Professor LING
Xiangquan in 1981. He argued that environmental rights form a necessary precondition
for the realization of labor rights and recommended the establishment of specific
provisions in the new constitution. Another article relating to that topic, “Discussion on
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeUnlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations