Green light for PPP on German motorways?

AuthorGreen light for PPP on German motorways?
Pages311-334
FRONTIERS OF LAW IN CHINA
VOL. 14 SEPTEMBER 2019 NO. 3
DOI 10.3868/s050-008-019-0016-2
FOCUS
RETHINKING PUBLIC–PRIVATE PARTNERSHIPS
GREEN LIGHT FOR PPP ON GERMAN MOTORWAYS?
Hartmut Bauer, Michael Meier∗∗
Abstract While public–private partnerships (PPPs) have surged worldwide since the
1990s, they have been met with growing skepticism during the last years. A recent
revision of Germany’s constitutional rules on motorway construction and observations
on the use of PPPs published by both the German and the European Courts of Auditors
illustrate this new caution. These two examples fit into a general trend towards a revival
of the public sector, which can be summarized under the cross-level umbrella term
“publicization.” It would, however, be remiss to replace the uncritical euphoria that once
surrounded privatization with a similarly undifferentiated euphoria regarding
publicization. Rather, it is crucial to identify the most appropriate solution for the
fulfilment of each public task from the “toolbox” of publicization on the one hand and
privatization on the other hand in order to ensure the most effective completion of public
functions.
Keywords publicization, remunicipalization, recommunalization, nationalization, rena-
tionalization, public–private partnerships, PPPs, privatization, motorways, infrastructure,
construction, toll, economic efficiency, court of auditors, debt ceiling, economic impact
analysis
INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................................... 312
I. REFORM OF THE ADMINISTRATION OF GERMAN MOTORWAYS ................................. 313
A. Background .......................................................................................................313
B. Government Draft Bill....................................................................................... 316
C. Legislative Process............................................................................................ 316
1. Barrier to Privatization of Motorways and the Infrastructure Company....... 317
2. Public–Private Partnerships on Individual Sections of the Motorways......... 318
Hartmut Bauer, Dr. iur., Dr. iur. habil., Faculty of Law, Augsburg University, Augsburg, Germany; Professor
in Public Law, Faculty of Law, Potsdam University, Potsdam 14482, Germany. Contact: lsbauer@uni-
potsdam.de
∗∗ Michael Meier, ass. iur., LL.B., Bucerius Law School, Hamburg, Germany; Ph.D. candidate and
Scientific Assistant, Faculty of Law, Potsdam University, Potsdam 14482, Germany. Contact: mimeier@uni-
potsdam.de
312 FRONTIERS OF LAW IN CHINA [Vol. 14: 311
D. Modified Reform Law ....................................................................................... 320
E. Impact of the Reform......................................................................................... 322
II. ECONOMIC EFFICIENCY OF PUBLIC–PRIVATE PARTNERSHIPS IN LONG-DISTANCE
ROAD CONSTRUCTION............................................................................................ 323
A. Recommendations of the German Federal Court of Auditors........................... 324
1. Systemic Additional Costs............................................................................. 324
2. Minimal Efficiency Gains.............................................................................. 326
3. Relationship to the Debt Ceiling.................................................................... 326
4. Macroeconomic Disadvantages ..................................................................... 327
5. Shortcomings in the Economic Impact Analysis ........................................... 328
B. Recommendations of the European Court of Auditors ...................................... 329
III. THE “RETURN OF THE PUBLIC............................................................................. 330
CONCLUSION........................................................................................................................ 332
INTRODUCTION
The use of public–private partnerships (PPPs) in the fulfilment of government tasks
has spread worldwide since the 1990s. In both Germany and China, PPPs have
established themselves in the construction of long-distance roads in particular.1 In the
meantime, however, the euphoria surrounding privatization that prevailed just two
decades ago has noticeably subsided.2 While efficiency advantages and the procurement
of capital attributed to the involvement of private entities continue to be cited as
arguments in favor of PPPs, other scholars warn of additional costs and loss of state
control. The German attitude towards PPPs can nowadays be described as ambivalent, as
illustrated by the most recent reform of the constitutional law on the construction and
management of German motorways which entailed a comprehensive revision of the
provisions contained in Article 90 of the Basic Law (Grundgesetz, Germany’s federal
constitution, hereinafter referred to as “GG”) (see Part I). More can be learned from
observations made by the German Federal Court of Auditors (Bundesrechnungshof) and
by the European Court of Auditors, both of which have recently come to a skeptical
assessment of PPPs in long-distance road construction and administration from an
economic perspective (see Part II). Overall, these developments dovetail with a more
general tendency to return to the public sector which can be summed up with the term
“publicization” (see Part III). If the participation of private entities is to be successful, it is
crucial to identify the appropriate extent to which they should be involved and the most
advantageous combinations of privatization and publicization (see Conclusion).
1 For more detail on Chinese and German long-distance road construction, see YU Wenguang, Praktische
Erfahrungen und rechtliche Probleme mit Public Private Partnership in der Verkehrsinfrastruktur in
Deutschland und China (Practical Experience and Legal Issues with PublicPrivate Partnership in Transport
Infrastructure in Germany and China), Peter Lang (Frankfurt am Main), at 88 et seq. (2010).
2 Hartmut Bauer, Publizisierung, Begriff – Befunde – Perspektiven (Publicization, Concept Findings
Perspectives), 69 Juristen Zeitung (JZ) (Lawyer’s Journal), 1017 (2014).

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT