The principle of proportionality: summary and consensus in the 6th International Conference on Human Rights Protection under Pandemic Prevention and Control, Beijing (China) 2020

AuthorGuo Xiaoming
Position(???) Post-Doctoral Researcher in Law and Development, McGill Faculty of Law, Montreal, Canada; Research Fellow, Human Rights Center, Renmin University of China, Beijing 100872, China. Contact: gxmfaxue@163.com
Pages122-141
FRONTIERS OF LAW IN CHINA
VOL. 16 MARCH 2021 NO. 1
DOI 10.3868/s050-010-021-0007-4
FOCUS
PROTECTION OF VULNERABLE GROUPS DURING COVID-19
THE PRINCIPLE OF PROPORTIONALITY: SUMMARY AND CONSENSUS IN THE 6TH
INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON HUMAN RIGHTS PROTECTION UNDER
PANDEMIC PREVENTION AND CONTROL, BEIJING (CHINA) 2020
GUO Xiaoming
Abstract Against the backdrop of the COVID-19 pandemic and China’s regularized
pandemic prevention and control, leading legal scholars from China, North America, and
Eurasia participated in The 6th International Conference on Human Rights Protection
under Pandemic Prevention and Control. Participants engaged in fruitful discussions on
the normative necessity and practical relevance of the principle of proportionality in
justifying their current governments’ anti-pandemic measures. Focusing on
pandemic-related human rights conditions and rule of law challenges in global contexts,
this article summarizes the participating scholars’ speeches through the integrated lens of
human rights and the jurisprudence of health law in the COVID-19 containment phase.
Speeches can be divided into six topical dimensions, involving normative utility,
governance logic, reasonable limits, constitutional criteria, viable approaches, and
post-pandemic challenges with respect to the principle of proportionality. To provide a
more policy-relevant and theoretically sound framework for a community of common
health for mankind, this article succinctly concludes with a series of overlapping
consensus on the application of the principle of proportionality in the fight against the
pandemic. This consensus, tentatively named the “Renmin Human Rights Consensus,”
builds on five interrelated elements and generates five human rights assertions and a
series of specific principles of health law.
Keywords anti-pandemic measures, COVID-19 containment phase, community of
common health for mankind, proportionality analysis, human rights jurisprudence, Renmin
Human Rights Consensus
(󲷂󰌨󰋣) Post-Doctoral Researcher in Law and Development, McGill Faculty of Law, Montreal, Canada;
Research Fellow, Human Rights Center, Renmin University of China, Beijing 100872, China. Contact:
gxmfaxue@163.com
This paper was revised and translated based on the original version published in Human Rights (󰐘),
Issue 4, 2020. It was funded by the Key Programme Project of Renmin University of China (2020), No.
20XNLG02. For the sake of pertinence and brevity, most panel commentaries and the Q&A session were
omitted. The author would like to express his gratitude to Professors HAN Dayuan and Nandini Ramanujam
for providing academic guidance and institutional support.
2021] THE PRINCIPLE OF PROPORTIONALITY 123
INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................................... 123
I. THE NORMATIVE UTILITY OF THE PRINCIPLE OF PROPORTIONALITY IN THE
CONTAINMENT OF COVID-19................................................................................ 124
II. THE GOVERNANCE LOGIC OF THE PRINCIPLE OF PROPORTIONALITY IN THE
CONTAINMENT OF COVID-19................................................................................ 126
III. REASONABLE LIMITS TO THE RESTRICTION ON HUMAN RIGHTS IN THE
CONTAINMENT OF COVID-19................................................................................ 128
IV. CONSTITUTIONAL CRITERIA FOR THE PROTECTION OF HUMAN RIGHTS IN THE
CONTAINMENT OF COVID-19................................................................................ 130
V. VIABLE APPROACHES TO THE REALIZATION OF HUMAN RIGHTS IN THE
CONTAINMENT OF COVID-19................................................................................ 133
VI. HUMAN RIGHTS CHALLENGES FOR THE REGULARIZED APPLICATION OF THE
PRINCIPLE OF PROPORTIONALITY IN THE POST-PANDEMIC ERA ........................... 136
CONCLUSION........................................................................................................................ 139
INTRODUCTION
In December 2019, the novel coronavirus cases emerged in Wuhan, China. On
January 30, 2020, the World Health Organization (WHO) officially declared the spread of
the disease a public health emergency of international concern. On February 11, 2020, the
WHO named the novel coronavirus disease “COVID-19” and declared its spread a global
pandemic on March 11, 2020. At this moment, the ongoing pandemic situation in China is
becoming significantly better and the governance capacity for law-based pandemic
prevention and control has considerably improved.1 However, the global pandemic
continues to heighten on an unprecedented scale, which poses pressing human rights
challenges with a keen focus on the role of the rule of law in the government’s
pandemic-related emergency and security measures.2 It is against the backdrop The 6th
International Conference on Human Rights Protection under Pandemic Prevention and
Control was held on June 20, 2020 in Beijing, China. This international webinar, hosted
by the China Society for Human Rights Studies and organized by the Human Rights
Center at Renmin University of China, focused on the proportionality logic underlying
human rights law in the global context of COVID-19 containment.
1 See Xi Stresses Law-Based Infection Prevention, Control, available at www.xinhuanet.com/
english/2020-02/05/c_138758520.htm (last visited Jul. 1, 2020).
2 The United Nations asserted that the best pandemic response is “one that aims to respond
proportionately to immediate threats whilst protecting human rights under the rule of law.” See United
Nations, COVID-19 and Human Rights: We Are All in This Together, available at https://www.un.org/
sites/un2.un.org/files/un_policy_brief_on_human_rights_and_covid_23_april_2020.pdf (last visited Jul. 1,
2020).

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT