The Role of Public Perception in the Rule of Law

AuthorGregory N. Mandel
Pages1-11
1.1 RULE OF LAW.DOC (DO NOT DELETE) 2019/1/7 2:47 PM
1
THE ROLE OF PUBLIC PERCEPTION IN THE RULE OF LAW
Gregory N. Mandel
Editor’s note
The following speech was given by Dean and Professor Gregory N. Mandel during “The
Tsinghua China Law Review 10th Anniversary S ymposium: China’s Role Under the
Globalization of the Rule of Law” at Tsinghua University School of Law in Beijing, China.
The speech has be en edited, replenished and modified, to the extent appropriate for
publication purpose.
I want to thank the Tsinghua China Law Review and congratulate
you on your 10th year. That is a fabulous accomplishment and I am
very honored to be here and speak at your anniversary symposium
today. My topic is the role that public perception plays in the success
or failure of the rule of law. The rule of law refers to the authority
and influence that law has in society, particularly as a constraint on
individual and institutional behavior.1 The promise of the rule of
law, as opposed to the rule of individuals, is that it is the law itself
that governs us, not the arbitrary whims or wishes of powerful
officials.2
Much of the conversation about the rule of law takes place from
this overarching policy level that I just mentioned. We can think of
this as a top-down approach to the rule of law: What kinds of laws,
legislative authority, and judicial capacity is necessary in order for
the government to establish the rule of law? My remarks to some
degree will view the rule of law from the opposite direction, from the
bottom-up. They focus on what kind of popular understanding and
* Dean and Peter J. Liacouras Professor of Law, Temple UniversityBeasley School of Law. Study
results referenced here are based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation under Grant
No. 1324138, for which I thank them. I also want to thank Madhumita Anand for her outstanding
research assistance on this article.
1 Margaret Jane Radin, Reconsidering the Rule of Law, 69 B.U. L. REV. 781, 781 (1989); J.
RAWLS, A THEORY OF JUSTICE 235 (1971).
2 Radin, supra note 1, at 781.

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT